Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-45388: [CI][MATLAB] Can we use Ubuntu 22.04 or 24.04 for Ubuntu CI #45395

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

sgilmore10
Copy link
Member

@sgilmore10 sgilmore10 commented Jan 30, 2025

Rationale for this change

Ubuntu 20.04 will reach EOL by 2025-04, so we must upgrade the MATLAB workflow's GitHub runner from Ubuntu 20.04 to Ubuntu 22.04 or Ubuntu 24.04.

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. Updated the Ubuntu MATLAB GitHub workflow to use Ubuntu 22.04 as the GitHub runner.
  2. Updated the Ubuntu MATLAB crossbow task to use Ubuntu 22.04 as the GitHub runner.

Are these changes tested?

  1. All GitHub checks passed.
  2. Manually triggered the MATLAB crossbow task and installed the MATLAB-Arrow Interface Toolbox on Debian-12.

Are there any user-facing changes?

N/A

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting review Awaiting review label Jan 30, 2025
@sgilmore10
Copy link
Member Author

@github-actions crossbow submit matlab

Copy link

Revision: e00cab4

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-54e7085b46

Task Status
matlab GitHub Actions

@sgilmore10 sgilmore10 marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2025 18:02
@sgilmore10
Copy link
Member Author

+1

@sgilmore10 sgilmore10 merged commit 42b84bd into apache:main Jan 30, 2025
11 checks passed
@sgilmore10 sgilmore10 removed the awaiting review Awaiting review label Jan 30, 2025
@sgilmore10 sgilmore10 deleted the GH-45388 branch January 30, 2025 19:35
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 42b84bd.

There were 8 benchmark results with an error:

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 30 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant