We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
刚刚在阅读最新的 Rubin 访谈发现,如果通过点击关键词 cos 访谈,发现找不到上次的 Breiman 访谈,但点击标题顶部的类别索引 COS 访谈,是可以找到的,虽然时间顺序并非与 COS 访谈的编号顺序一致。
进一步看文档,发现 Rubin 的那篇是既有 “COS 访谈” 的 tag 和 category,而 Breiman 是只有 category。其它访谈也没有保持一致。
所以同时存在是否多余?如果不,那是否应该保持一致?另外,既然 COS 访谈有期数编号,是否展示顺序以期数为准,而非时间顺序?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
是多余。在标签(tag)和分类(category)问题上,作者和编辑们似乎都比较随意。标签应该相当于关键词、更细致,分类是大类、相当于栏目。理想情况下二者最好不要有重叠。
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
刚刚在阅读最新的 Rubin 访谈发现,如果通过点击关键词 cos 访谈,发现找不到上次的 Breiman 访谈,但点击标题顶部的类别索引 COS 访谈,是可以找到的,虽然时间顺序并非与 COS 访谈的编号顺序一致。
进一步看文档,发现 Rubin 的那篇是既有 “COS 访谈” 的 tag 和 category,而 Breiman 是只有 category。其它访谈也没有保持一致。
所以同时存在是否多余?如果不,那是否应该保持一致?另外,既然 COS 访谈有期数编号,是否展示顺序以期数为准,而非时间顺序?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: