-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Errors without messages #604
Labels
Comments
waiting-for-dev
added a commit
to waiting-for-dev/dry-schema
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2019
It makes message compiler a specific case of a generic error compiler, just like new ast error compiler. References dry-rb/dry-validation#604
waiting-for-dev
added a commit
to waiting-for-dev/dry-schema
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2019
It makes message compiler a specific case of a generic error compiler, just like new ast error compiler. References dry-rb/dry-validation#604
waiting-for-dev
added a commit
to waiting-for-dev/dry-schema
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2019
It makes message compiler a specific case of a generic error compiler, just like new ast error compiler. References dry-rb/dry-validation#604
waiting-for-dev
added a commit
to waiting-for-dev/dry-schema
that referenced
this issue
Jan 11, 2020
It makes message compiler a specific case of a generic error compiler, just like new ast error compiler. References dry-rb/dry-validation#604
Any plans to revisit this issue? |
@guilherme-andrade it's marked as |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
At the moment validation contract returns nice human-readable errors via translation backend. Being a robot, I do not like it and I'd prefer pure data object/hash to be returned.
Justification: I don't think it is contract responsibility to translate it's errors. When used within API, all the i18n normally happens on the client side, so API can be completely translation-free.
Examples
(The above is only example response, I have no strong preference/opinion on how that data should be represented)
Resources
Discourse "discussion": https://discourse.dry-rb.org/t/dry-validation-and-error-translations/919
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: