We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Our team has identified msys2.0.dll calling undocumented Windows APIs like ntdll.dll!NtAssignProcessToJobObject - which is included in mingit/Git for Windows. Code pointer in cygwin: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Acygwin%2Fcygwin+NtAssignProcessToJobObject&type=code with a caller: cygwin/winsup/cygwin/resource.cc at 21a2c9db6952954608cdf92638b411b15e7606c6 · cygwin/cygwin
We believe the undocumented call should get replaced by the following documented API - AssignProcessToJobObject function (jobapi2.h) - Win32 apps | Microsoft Learn
Here are some other undocumented API calls also identified:
Could a change be driven to update the above? We will investigate further to try to propose a change. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Mail on the Cygwin mailing list: https://inbox.sourceware.org/cygwin/IA3PR21MB42696BB656E25C4E405BDB3E8C1D2@IA3PR21MB4269.namprd21.prod.outlook.com/T/#u
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Our team has identified msys2.0.dll calling undocumented Windows APIs like ntdll.dll!NtAssignProcessToJobObject - which is included in mingit/Git for Windows.
Code pointer in cygwin: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Acygwin%2Fcygwin+NtAssignProcessToJobObject&type=code with a caller: cygwin/winsup/cygwin/resource.cc at 21a2c9db6952954608cdf92638b411b15e7606c6 · cygwin/cygwin
We believe the undocumented call should get replaced by the following documented API - AssignProcessToJobObject function (jobapi2.h) - Win32 apps | Microsoft Learn
Here are some other undocumented API calls also identified:
Could a change be driven to update the above? We will investigate further to try to propose a change. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: