-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FNAT with two-arm is not working #986
Comments
I didn't find any problem in your configuration. You may further analyse the problem with the following advices.
|
@ywc689 Thank you for your helpful advice. I have checked your advices, and the results are as follows.
|
Additionally, I have attached our
|
As shown in your statistics, fullnat connection was not created. It suggests do the following checks and tests.
|
I am currently testing my software-based L4 load balancer using DPVS v1.9.6 in Full-NAT with a two-arm configuration.
The following configuration was created based on your tutorial documentation.
After applying this configuration, the ping tests to 192.168.250.201 and 172.30.1.100 are successful.
However, when I send packets from the client to the load balancer, it receives the packets but does not forward them to backend side.
In another test, I switched the forwarding mode to Masquerade using the -m option in the 'ipvsadm' command. While the Masquerade mode operates correctly, the source address is not translated to the load balancer's local IP address as a matter of course.
The FNAT mode is crucial for my setup.
Could you please advise on how to properly configure the FNAT mode with a two-arm setup?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: