You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There were two samples that the allocation was not correct.
This is related to the data from #47 (Olink-NeuroEpiCas).
In each plate (index 1) there were two samples to the same well.
It could be either spatial is faulty or inspect is faulty.
I could manually resolve the issue by using position_name.
The reason seems that plate 1 didn't use the well that was assigned to plate 2.
And vice versa, so both plates ended up with problems.
Consider exporting position_name and add more internal checks of the output of spatial and inspect.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
position_name returns a factor with all the possible positions so that will help to sort them.
The commit fixed the issue with the code and it is simpler and faster.
There were two samples that the allocation was not correct.
This is related to the data from #47 (Olink-NeuroEpiCas).
In each plate (index 1) there were two samples to the same well.
It could be either spatial is faulty or inspect is faulty.
I could manually resolve the issue by using
position_name
.The reason seems that plate 1 didn't use the well that was assigned to plate 2.
And vice versa, so both plates ended up with problems.
Consider exporting
position_name
and add more internal checks of the output ofspatial
andinspect
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: