-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement engineering metadata mode #22
Comments
JWST has a keyword named for example for nircam: Currently I am using In the file naming document https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ppkyuNsjVyTtxLoCQM04nfjET_ZmqywTiw9LiR-ny78/edit I found this about exposure types:
Consider also that we use the So how do we reconcile all of this? |
So EXP_TYPE makes sense, but I also remember seeing JWST using ref_type to
mark dark,flat etc. Is this redundant?
In the DRS metadata sheet I used FILETYPE to denote the type of file. But
maybe better to stick with JWST keywords as much as possible.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ja0kASKm5SySP79FgYpg1Fjcz5OOTrEx1waK398kQHw/edit#gid=0
…On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 13:47, Andrea Zonca ***@***.***> wrote:
@ikashell <https://github.com/ikashell> @arunsurya77
<https://github.com/arunsurya77>
JWST has a keyword named EXP_TYPE,
see its possible values:
https://jwst-pipeline.readthedocs.io/en/latest/jwst/assign_wcs/exp_types.html#wcs-reference-file-information-per-exp-type
for example for nircam: NRC_IMAGE, NRC_TSIMAGE, NRC_FOCUS, NRC_TACONFIRM,
NRC_TACQ
Currently I am using IRIS_IMAGE for all files.
In the file naming document
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ppkyuNsjVyTtxLoCQM04nfjET_ZmqywTiw9LiR-ny78/edit
I found this about exposure types:
DRK MasterDark Image
IDP Instrumental Dispersion
NFF Normalized Flat field Image
TEL Telluric Standard
FLX Flux Standard
ARC Calibration lamp
SKY Sky Frame
SCI Science Frame
Consider also that we use the DATAMODL keyword to identify the file
structure, see #23 <#23>
So how do we reconcile all of this?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKB37LTFXYERBGXXDIMCITTRQMM57ANCNFSM4M22NYUQ>
.
|
also when we specify the association, we can input a hopefully, this is optional and if missing, picks up the |
unfortunately it is not the case @arunsurya77 is the type of file (background, science) encoded also in the filename somehow? |
sorry @arunsurya77 for the unnecessary question, Anyway, the DRS assembly knows from the sequencer what is the observation plan so knows which observation ID is background. |
My proposal is to keep:
Checking the JWST definition https://github.com/spacetelescope/jwst/blob/master/jwst/datamodels/schemas/keyword_exptype.schema.yaml I think we should also prepend with And then have another FITS keyword:
@arunsurya77 @ikashell is this redundant? or is it fine? |
The exp_type is mentioned for processed frames pYYMMDD_i/s_obsid_exp#_sub#_type.fits |
FITS keyword: "INSTMODE"
Value: "ENG", "SCI", "CAL"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: