Replies: 4 comments
-
Could you replace WHERE with HAVING? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello @danilort
Although I understand that HAVING really works in this case. The computation of WHERE value occurs earlier than the SELECT, in contrast to the sorting, which occurs at the end. I'm afraid that this task, unfortunately do not have optimal solution. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello Lon. Danilo |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I apologize that I could not help in this situation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
System information:
Connection specification:
Describe the problem you're observing:
Steps to reproduce, if exist:
Steps to reproduce:
if I replace the #2 with:
2) CLIC BUTTON: sort by column
(OK, works well)
if I write the #1, without using alias:
(OK, works well)
Include any warning/errors/backtraces from the logs
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions