Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supersmoother vs LOWESS #6

Open
ncooder opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Supersmoother vs LOWESS #6

ncooder opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@ncooder
Copy link

ncooder commented Jan 22, 2025

You use the stats::supsmu() for smoothing and extracting the trend. Have you tried also LOWESS algorithm and benchmark your solution?

@timginker
Copy link
Owner

Setting default hyperparameters for LOWESS that work reasonably well in various practical scenarios is challenging. That's why I opted for stats::supsmu() to facilitate automation. However, I agree that adding more options for trend extraction could be beneficial.

@ncooder
Copy link
Author

ncooder commented Jan 23, 2025

@timginker That is correct, the proper use of LOWESS can be challenging, but still it would be great to have more trend extraction options available in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants