Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-deploy the Water Storage Mapper (only) #698

Open
jenniferRapp opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Re-deploy the Water Storage Mapper (only) #698

jenniferRapp opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@jenniferRapp
Copy link

When the modelers are happy with the Pipeline 2 updates and the data are correct, re-deploy the Water Storage pipeline. I don't think we will deploy Water Temperature for a long time (months to year) and I don't know about wateruse. What are some options for removing the Temperature and Use tabs from the Prod server? The About page content could be updated to represent only water storage and could be posted again.

@mhines-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

mhines-usgs commented Feb 9, 2021

http://wbeep-test-website.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/estimated-availability/#/water-storage
Marty and I worked to figure out a clean way to remove the water temp and storage content. Please let us know if you think the About page looks OK, we just commented out the entire sections for water temp and use, and adjusted a few sentences where they were tied together. You can see the code diff here: https://github.com/usgs-makerspace/wbeep-viz/pull/653/files#diff-f22b56f87d5f2203c7eaa1f77720806fdba70f1a31eeb6e58090fe34f0d8a71e

@jenniferRapp
Copy link
Author

jenniferRapp commented Feb 10, 2021

I think it looks very nice. Thank you Megan and Marty. I think your edits to the About page work. We may need to get the modelers to update the Q&A section for more clear wording of things. The only thing I saw was one place where there is a space before a period at the end of the first sentence in the About page.

There was discussion about the Water Use going back into prod. They are talking about doing more reviews though, so I'm not really sure that will happen.

Is it OK to share out test with the modeling team?

@mhines-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

sure, I don't see why we can't share Test out with them.

I'll make a quick fix for that extraneous space, thanks for noticing it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants