You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The type systemd::service_limits is deprecated and systemd::manage_dropin or systemd::dropin_file should be used instead.
What are you seeing
Wanting to set LimitNOFILE with the puppet-systemd module, I read the deprecation notice and used systemd::dropin_file as we already have a working example. The limit was set correctly for the service, but on re-review of the module code, I felt using systemd::manage_dropin would be less error prone
When using service_entry in systemd::manage_dropin, the dropin file was correctly created but the service did not have its limit changed. I had to add notify_service: true for the service to be restarted and set the limit correctly
What behaviour did you expect instead
Given the deprecation notice and systemd::manage_dropin or systemd::dropin_file are offered as equal alternatives, I would expect both types to have the same defaults for notify_service, whereas we have different defaults
I am guessing some of this came from the work in #463
Also, I am well aware I could be told to RTFM, which I ended up doing, but in the spirit of the principle of least surprise and people who come after me, it would be nice to have a consistent default for notify_service (and IMHO, that would be true)
Thanks for such a great module, always appreciate your work
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
+1 for consistent behavior. IMHO, the default should be to restart what has to be restarted, and offer the possibility to opt-out from restarting services if needed be.
Affected Puppet, Ruby, OS and module versions/distributions
How to reproduce (e.g Puppet code you use)
The deprecation notice states:
What are you seeing
Wanting to set
LimitNOFILE
with thepuppet-systemd
module, I read the deprecation notice and usedsystemd::dropin_file
as we already have a working example. The limit was set correctly for the service, but on re-review of the module code, I felt usingsystemd::manage_dropin
would be less error proneWhen using
service_entry
insystemd::manage_dropin
, the dropin file was correctly created but the service did not have its limit changed. I had to addnotify_service: true
for the service to be restarted and set the limit correctlyWhat behaviour did you expect instead
Given the deprecation notice and
systemd::manage_dropin
orsystemd::dropin_file
are offered as equal alternatives, I would expect both types to have the same defaults fornotify_service
, whereas we have different defaultsAny additional information you'd like to impart
I am guessing some of this came from the work in #463
Also, I am well aware I could be told to RTFM, which I ended up doing, but in the spirit of the principle of least surprise and people who come after me, it would be nice to have a consistent default for
notify_service
(and IMHO, that would betrue
)Thanks for such a great module, always appreciate your work
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: