Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shared Brotli ID is expired #101

Open
svgeesus opened this issue Jun 21, 2022 · 8 comments
Open

Shared Brotli ID is expired #101

svgeesus opened this issue Jun 21, 2022 · 8 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

We reference shared brotli which expired Jan 27, 2022 .

Is this expected to become an Informational RFC?

@svgeesus svgeesus added question Further information is requested Patch Subset Solution includes something specific to patch subset method labels Jun 21, 2022
@garretrieger
Copy link
Contributor

I'll check in with the compression team and see what the status is.

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

From Internet-Drafts:

Internet-Drafts (often referred to simply as "drafts") have no formal status, and are subject to change or removal at any time; therefore they should not be cited or quoted in any formal document.

From Publication Process

Independent Submissions

Anyone can write an Internet-Draft and independently submit it to the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE) for possible publication as an RFC (Informational, Experimental, and Historic categories only). It will be reviewed for technical competence, relevance, and adequate writing. It will also be reviewed by the ISE and by the IESG for possible conflict with the IETF process. If selected for publication, the submission will enter the RFC Editor’s publication queue.

An independent submission must first be published as an Internet-Draft. Please see the instructions on the Independent Submissions page regarding submission.

Also relevant: Choosing between Informational and Experimental Status

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

So I think the next steps are:

  1. Publish another Internet Draft, so that there is a current one
  2. Make an Independent Submission of that ID as an Informational RFC.

@garretrieger
Copy link
Contributor

garretrieger commented Sep 19, 2022

So I was reading over the shared brotli specification and it turns out we only require the functionality defined in one section, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format-08#section-3.2 for this use case. That section is pretty short and provides a pretty simple modification to the original specification.

If the shared brotli RFC has not progressed beyond internet draft by the time we want to publish the IFT spec we could consider unblocking ourselves by just including the text of section 3.2 directly in the IFT spec description of the brotli patching format.

@garretrieger
Copy link
Contributor

Going to close this for now as the draft is no longer expired (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format-09), we can revisit whether to link this spec or include the relevant text here in the future depending on whether the spec has progressed beyond a draft by then.

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

It expired again:

Expires: March 28, 2023

@svgeesus svgeesus reopened this May 25, 2023
@svgeesus svgeesus removed the Patch Subset Solution includes something specific to patch subset method label Jul 24, 2024
@garretrieger
Copy link
Contributor

Small update here, the spec has been updated again so it's no longer expired (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format/). The latest update looks to have removed the TBD stuff and looks to be aiming to go through review now. So for now I think we should continue to depend on it and keep an eye out on it's progress.

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor Author

The Last Call Review is overall positive and asks for a couple of minor points (grammar, number of authors) to be addressed. Last call ends 23 Oct 2024.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants