Moving files to where they are in upstream #60
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to import paths and adjustments in configuration files for the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
pyproject.toml (1)
15-15: LGTM! Moving to src-layout is a good practice.The change to use
"src/"as the source directory follows the recommended Python packaging best practice of using a src-layout. This helps prevent implicit package imports during development and ensures a clean installation environment.This change:
- Prevents accidental imports from the project root
- Makes the package installation more reliable
- Ensures development environment matches installation environment
tests/cli/test_utils.py (1)
10-10: Consider removing the unused import pylint disable.The
# pylint: disable=unused-importcomment suggests that the import is not directly used in this file. However, checking the code shows thatmake_sample_videois actually used in thetest_can_split_videomethod. Therefore, this pylint disable comment appears unnecessary.-from tests.unit.test_video import make_sample_video # pylint: disable=unused-import +from tests.unit.test_video import make_sample_videotests/unit/test_image_zip_format.py (2)
Line range hint
89-89: Consider using a more robust test data path resolution.The hardcoded path to test assets could be problematic if the test directory structure changes.
Consider using
pkg_resourcesorimportlib.resourcesfor more reliable test data access:-DUMMY_DATASET_DIR = osp.join(osp.dirname(__file__), "assets", "image_zip_dataset") +from importlib.resources import files +DUMMY_DATASET_DIR = str(files("tests").joinpath("unit/assets/image_zip_dataset"))
Line range hint
15-88: Consider adding docstrings to test methods.While the test methods have clear names, adding docstrings would improve documentation and help developers understand the test scenarios better.
Example for the first test method:
@mark_requirement(Requirements.DATUM_267) def test_can_save_and_load(self): """ Test basic functionality of saving and loading image datasets. Verifies that images can be correctly serialized to zip and deserialized back. """tests/unit/test_common_semantic_segmentation_format.py (1)
Test coverage for category labels is incomplete
After analyzing the test cases and category definitions, I found that:
- The categories dictionary defines 8 labels (0-7): Void, Animal, Archway, Bicyclist, Child, Road, Pedestrian, and SignSymbol
- Current test cases only use labels 1 (Animal), 3 (Bicyclist), 4 (Child), 5 (Road), and 7 (SignSymbol)
- Labels 0 (Void), 2 (Archway), and 6 (Pedestrian) are not covered in any test cases
Consider adding test cases that include masks with the missing labels to ensure complete coverage of all defined categories.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
89-134: Verify test coverage for non-standard structureThe test case enhancement with additional mask annotation improves coverage. However, let's verify that all possible label combinations in the categories are adequately tested.
Let me gather more information about the test cases and their coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all category labels defined in the test are covered by test cases # Search for category definitions and their usage in test assertions rg -A 10 "make_categories\(" "tests/unit/test_common_semantic_segmentation_format.py" # Search for similar test patterns across the codebase to ensure consistency ast-grep --pattern 'make_categories( OrderedDict([ $$$ ]) )'Length of output: 3627
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Mask annotations in the test file to analyze label coverage rg -B 2 -A 2 "Mask\(image=" tests/unit/test_common_semantic_segmentation_format.py # Search for test method definitions to understand the test structure ast-grep --pattern 'def test_$_($$$)'Length of output: 1335
tests/unit/test_util.py (2)
Line range hint
18-168: Consider using more specific requirement tags.Currently, all test methods are tagged with
Requirements.DATUM_GENERAL_REQ. Consider using more specific requirement tags to better track test coverage for different features. This would improve traceability between tests and specific functionality.For example:
- Scope-related tests could use a dedicated requirement tag
- OS utility tests could have their own requirement tag
- Method redefinition tests could use a separate tag
Would you like me to help create more specific requirement tags and update the tests accordingly?
Line range hint
115-115: Fix typo in test method name.The test method name contains a typo:
test_can_fowrard_argsshould betest_can_forward_args.- def test_can_fowrard_args(self): + def test_can_forward_args(self):tests/unit/test_video.py (1)
Line range hint
40-186: Consider enhancing test documentationWhile the test coverage is comprehensive, consider adding docstrings to test methods to:
- Document test scenarios and edge cases
- Explain test data setup and expected outcomes
- Document any assumptions or limitations
This would improve maintainability and help other developers understand the test cases better.
Example for one test method:
@mark_requirement(Requirements.DATUM_GENERAL_REQ) @scoped def test_can_read_frames_randomly(self, fxt_sample_video): """ Validates random access to video frames. Test ensures: - Frames can be accessed in any order - Frame data and indices are correct regardless of access order - No state is maintained between frame accesses Args: fxt_sample_video: Fixture providing a test video with known frame data """tests/unit/test_mots_format.py (1)
14-14: Consider enhancing test requirement documentation.The test cases use
Requirements.DATUM_GENERAL_REQ, but it might be helpful to use more specific requirement identifiers that better reflect what each test is validating (e.g., mask handling, character encoding support, etc.).tests/unit/test_coco_format.py (2)
Line range hint
1-1024: Comprehensive test coverage with robust test casesThe test suite demonstrates excellent coverage of COCO format functionality:
- Tests for all COCO annotation types (instances, keypoints, captions, etc.)
- Error handling and edge cases
- Data validation
- Import/export functionality
- File handling and paths
- Character encoding support (CJK, Cyrillic)
Consider adding the following test cases to further improve coverage:
- Test for handling corrupted COCO JSON files
- Test for very large datasets to verify performance
- Test for concurrent access scenarios
Line range hint
1024-1025: Test file exceeds recommended lengthThe test file is quite long (>1000 lines). Consider splitting it into smaller, focused test files for better maintainability.
Suggested split:
test_coco_import.py- Import related teststest_coco_export.py- Export related teststest_coco_error_handling.py- Error cases
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
src/datumaro/plugins/openvino_plugin/samples/coco.classis excluded by!**/*.classsrc/datumaro/plugins/openvino_plugin/samples/imagenet.classis excluded by!**/*.class
📒 Files selected for processing (63)
- pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
- setup.py (1 hunks)
- tests/cli/test_utils.py (1 hunks)
- tests/cli/test_video.py (1 hunks)
- tests/conftest.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/algorithms/test_RISE.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/data_formats/test_mapillary_vistas_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/data_formats/test_synthia_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_align_celeba_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_annotation_util.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_api.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_brats_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_brats_numpy_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_camvid_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_celeba_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_cifar_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_cityscapes_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_coco_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_common_semantic_segmentation_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_common_super_resolution_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_compare.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_config.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_cvat_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_dataset.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_datumaro_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_fractal_image_generator.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_icdar_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_image.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_image_dir_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_image_zip_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_imagenet_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_imagenet_txt_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_images.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_kinetics_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_kitti_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_labelme_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_lfw_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_market1501_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_masks.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_mnist_csv_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_mnist_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_mot_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_mots_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_mpii_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_mpii_json_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_ndr.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_nyu_depth_v2_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_ops.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_project.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_sampler.py (2 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_sly_pointcloud_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_splitter.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_telemetry_utils.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_tfrecord_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_transforms.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_util.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_validator.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_vgg_face2_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_video.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_voc_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_vott_csv_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_vott_json_format.py (1 hunks)
- tests/unit/test_widerface_format.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (18)
- tests/unit/algorithms/test_RISE.py
- tests/unit/test_camvid_format.py
- tests/unit/test_cifar_format.py
- tests/unit/test_cityscapes_format.py
- tests/unit/test_compare.py
- tests/unit/test_config.py
- tests/unit/test_cvat_format.py
- tests/unit/test_dataset.py
- tests/unit/test_kitti_format.py
- tests/unit/test_lfw_format.py
- tests/unit/test_masks.py
- tests/unit/test_ndr.py
- tests/unit/test_ops.py
- tests/unit/test_sly_pointcloud_format.py
- tests/unit/test_splitter.py
- tests/unit/test_tfrecord_format.py
- tests/unit/test_validator.py
- tests/unit/test_voc_format.py
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (54)
tests/unit/test_api.py (2)
5-5: LGTM! Import path change looks good.The change from relative to absolute import improves clarity and maintainability while maintaining the same functionality.
5-5: Verify consistent import path changes across test files.Let's ensure this change is consistently applied across all test files.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell script execution, I can now generate the final response:
Import path changes are consistently applied across test files
The verification shows that:
- No relative imports (
.requirements) were found in any test files- The absolute import
from tests.requirements importis consistently used across all test files🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements/mark_requirement # and verify the consistency of the new absolute imports. echo "Checking for any remaining relative imports..." rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/" echo -e "\nVerifying consistent use of new absolute imports..." rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 2572
pyproject.toml (1)
19-20: Verify the path updates are complete across the project.The omit paths have been correctly updated to reflect the new src-layout structure. However, we should verify that all related configurations and imports have been updated consistently.
Let's verify the consistency of these changes:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate additional verification scripts to ensure we have a complete picture.
This will help us verify:
- The Python import statements across the codebase
- Additional configuration files that might need updates
- Package manifest configuration
- Tox configuration for testing
Let's examine these results before making a final determination.
Based on the comprehensive verification results, I can now provide a final response:
Path updates are correctly implemented across the project
The verification shows that:
- All Python imports consistently use the new src-layout structure
- The package configuration in setup.py correctly uses
package_dir={"": "src"}andpackages=setuptools.find_packages(where="src")- The MANIFEST.in and other configuration files are properly set up
- The remaining references to "datumaro/" in files are either:
- Documentation/URLs in comments and requirements files
- Correct imports from the new src layout
- Web paths in site configuration
- Test assets and documentation references
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all configuration files and imports are updated for the new src layout # Test 1: Check for any remaining references to the old datumaro/ path echo "Checking for old path references..." rg "datumaro/" -g "!*.md" -g "!.git/*" -g "!src/*" # Test 2: Verify setup.py is updated for src layout echo "Checking setup.py configuration..." rg "package_dir|packages|find_packages" setup.py # Test 3: Check for any tox.ini or pytest.ini configurations that might need updates echo "Checking test configurations..." fd -e ini -x cat {}Length of output: 2306
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the imports in Python files to ensure they're consistent with src layout # Check Python imports patterns echo "Checking Python import patterns..." rg "^from datumaro|^import datumaro" -g "*.py" # Check any potential configuration in setup.cfg if it exists echo "Checking setup.cfg if exists..." fd "setup.cfg" -x cat {} # Check any MANIFEST.in for package data inclusion patterns echo "Checking MANIFEST.in if exists..." fd "MANIFEST.in" -x cat {} # Check tox configuration for any path references echo "Checking tox configuration..." fd "tox.ini" -x cat {}Length of output: 106291
tests/cli/test_utils.py (1)
10-10: Verify the impact of absolute import path change.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the PR's objective of reorganizing files. However, let's verify that the new import path is consistent across all test files.
✅ Verification successful
The results show that the absolute import path
from tests.unit.test_video importis consistently used in bothtests/cli/test_video.pyandtests/cli/test_utils.py, and there are no remaining relative imports oftest_video. Let me verify one more thing to ensure there are no other variations of imports for this module.
Let me try a different approach to ensure we catch all possible import patterns:
Import path change is consistent across the codebase
The verification confirms that the absolute import path
from tests.unit.test_video import make_sample_videois used consistently in both files that import the module (tests/cli/test_video.pyandtests/cli/test_utils.py). There are no remaining relative imports or inconsistent import patterns for this module.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of test_video and verify consistency # of the new absolute import path across test files echo "Checking for any remaining relative imports of test_video:" rg -l "from \.\. import test_video" "tests/" rg -l "from \.\.test_video import" "tests/" echo -e "\nVerifying consistency of new absolute import path:" rg -l "from tests\.unit\.test_video import" "tests/"Length of output: 433
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any other variations of test_video imports rg -l "import.*test_video" "tests/"Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any mentions of test_video in import statements with more context rg "import.*test_video|from.*test_video" tests/ -A 1Length of output: 376
tests/conftest.py (1)
8-9: LGTM! Import organization looks good.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the project restructuring. The blank line properly separates import sections according to PEP 8.
Let's verify the consistency of import patterns across test files:
✅ Verification successful
Import pattern inconsistency detected across test files
The verification results show that while
tests/conftest.pyand many other test files use absolute imports (from tests.utils.test_utils import), there might still be files using relative imports (from .utils.test_utils import). Let's verify if there are any remaining relative imports that need to be updated for consistency.
Let's try one more verification with a different approach to ensure we have accurate information about the import patterns:
Import pattern is consistent - change is verified
The verification shows that all test files are consistently using absolute imports (
from tests.utils.test_utils import) rather than relative imports. This includes:
- The main conftest.py file
- All unit test files under tests/unit/
- All CLI test files under tests/cli/
- All format-specific test files
The change from relative to absolute imports in
tests/conftest.pyaligns with the existing pattern across the test suite, making the codebase more consistent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if other test files still use relative imports for test_utils # to ensure consistency across the test suite # Search for relative imports of test_utils rg -l "from \.utils\.test_utils import" "tests/" # Search for absolute imports of test_utils rg -l "from tests\.utils\.test_utils import" "tests/"Length of output: 2636
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual content of imports to identify which files still use relative imports rg "from \.utils\.test_utils import" "tests/" -A 1Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the first few lines of each test file that imports test_utils to see the actual import pattern for file in $(rg -l "test_utils import" tests/); do echo "=== $file ===" head -n 15 "$file" | rg "test_utils import" doneLength of output: 19636
tests/unit/test_nyu_depth_v2_format.py (1)
13-13: LGTM! Import path standardization looks good.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the PR's objective of matching upstream structure and maintains consistency with similar changes across other test files.
Let's verify the import path exists:
✅ Verification successful
Import path standardization is verified and consistent
The verification confirms:
- The
requirements.pymodule exists at the expected path:tests/requirements.py- The absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements importis consistently used across all test files in the codebase (60+ files)- This change aligns perfectly with the established pattern in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the requirements module exists in the tests directory # and is consistently imported across test files # Test 1: Check if the requirements module exists fd "requirements.py" tests/ # Test 2: Verify consistent usage of absolute imports across test files rg "from tests.requirements import" tests/Length of output: 6517
tests/unit/test_fractal_image_generator.py (1)
11-11: LGTM! Verify test execution environment.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with Python best practices and upstream repository structure. This makes the imports more explicit and resilient to file moves.
Let's verify that other test files follow the same import pattern:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since we have clear evidence about the import patterns across the test files.
Import pattern is consistently using absolute imports
The verification shows that all test files, including the one under review, are using the absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements import. No files were found using the relative import pattern.requirements, confirming that this change maintains consistency across the entire test suite.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in requirements import across test files # Expect: All test files should use the absolute import pattern # Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/" # Compare with absolute imports for validation rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 2350
tests/cli/test_video.py (1)
7-7: LGTM! Verify the new import path.The import path update aligns with the PR objective of matching upstream file structure.
Let's verify the new import path exists:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another verification script to check the content of the function since ast-grep didn't show the match details:
Import path verification successful
The verification confirms that:
- The file
tests/unit/test_video.pyexists in the new location- The
make_sample_videofunction is present in the file with the expected signature- The function implementation matches the expected utility (video creation with OpenCV)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new import path exists and contains the make_sample_video function # Test 1: Check if the new file exists fd "test_video.py" "tests/unit" # Test 2: Verify the function exists in the new location ast-grep --pattern 'def make_sample_video($$$)' tests/unit/test_video.pyLength of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of test_video.py to verify the function definition rg -A 5 "def make_sample_video" tests/unit/test_video.pyLength of output: 217
tests/unit/test_common_super_resolution_format.py (1)
13-13: LGTM! Import path standardization looks good.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the project's goal of standardizing import paths across test files.
Let's verify this standardization pattern across other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since we have clear evidence about the import patterns across test files.
Import standardization is already consistently applied
The verification shows that all test files under
tests/are already using the absolute import patternfrom tests.requirements importand there are no remaining relative imports (.requirements). This confirms that the import standardization has been successfully applied across the entire test suite, making this change consistent with the existing codebase pattern.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that other test files follow the same import pattern # Expected: All test files should use absolute imports from tests.requirements # Test: Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/" # Test: Confirm the standardized absolute import pattern rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 2350
tests/unit/test_kinetics_format.py (1)
15-15: LGTM! The absolute import path enhances maintainability.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the PR objective of matching upstream structure and improves code organization.
Let's verify the consistency of this import pattern across the test suite:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Import pattern is consistently using absolute imports across the test suite
The verification confirms that:
- No test files are using relative imports for Requirements (
.requirements)- The absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements importis consistently used across all test files in the suiteThis validates that the change aligns with the codebase's established import pattern and maintains consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test files use absolute imports for Requirements # Test 1: Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements echo "Checking for relative imports of Requirements..." rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/" # Test 2: Verify the adoption of absolute imports echo "Verifying absolute imports..." rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 2526
tests/unit/test_brats_format.py (1)
13-13: LGTM! Verify consistency of import changes across test files.The change from relative to absolute import improves clarity and maintainability, aligning with Python's import best practices.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response since we have comprehensive information about the import patterns across the codebase.
Import changes are consistent across the entire test suite
The verification confirms that:
- No relative imports (
.requirements) remain in the test files- All test files consistently use the absolute import
from tests.requirements import- The
requirements.pymodule exists at the correct location:tests/requirements.py🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all test files use absolute imports for requirements # Test 1: Search for any remaining relative imports of requirements echo "Checking for remaining relative imports..." rg "from \.requirements import" "tests/" # Test 2: Verify the adoption of absolute imports echo "Verifying absolute imports..." rg "from tests\.requirements import" "tests/" # Test 3: Verify the requirements module exists echo "Checking requirements module location..." fd "requirements.py" "tests/"Length of output: 6814
tests/unit/test_image_dir_format.py (1)
10-10: LGTM: Import path change aligns with project structure.The change from relative to absolute import path is consistent with the PR's objective of aligning with upstream file organization. This standardization improves maintainability by making import paths explicit and consistent across the test suite.
Let's verify this is part of a consistent pattern across test files:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since we have clear evidence about the import patterns across the test files.
Verified: Import change follows established project-wide pattern
The absolute import
from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirementis consistently used across 62 test files in the project, and there are no remaining relative imports (.requirements). This confirms that the import change intest_image_dir_format.pyaligns with the project's standardized approach to imports in the test suite.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the import pattern across test files # Expected: Most test files should use the absolute import pattern # Check the current import pattern in test files rg -l "from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement" "tests/" # Check if there are any remaining relative imports rg -l "from .requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement" "tests/"Length of output: 2381
tests/unit/test_telemetry_utils.py (2)
13-13: LGTM! Import path update aligns with project standards.The change from relative to absolute import enhances maintainability and clarity while matching the upstream structure.
13-13: Verify consistent import usage across test files.Let's ensure this import pattern is consistently applied across all test files.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response:
Import pattern is consistently used across test files
The verification shows that all test files are using the absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement. No relative imports (.requirements) were found, confirming consistent usage across the entire test suite.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements/mark_requirement # and verify the new absolute import pattern is used consistently. # Test 1: Search for any remaining relative imports echo "Checking for remaining relative imports..." rg -l "from \.requirements import .*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/" # Test 2: Verify the new absolute import pattern echo "Verifying new absolute import pattern..." rg -l "from tests\.requirements import .*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/"Length of output: 2603
tests/unit/test_brats_numpy_format.py (1)
13-13: LGTM! Import path standardization improves maintainability.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing file locations and improves test suite maintainability by making the import path explicit.
Let's verify this standardization across other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since we have clear evidence about the import patterns across the test files.
Import standardization is already consistent across test files
The verification shows that the absolute import path
from tests.requirements importis consistently used across all test files, including the modified filetests/unit/test_brats_numpy_format.py. No relative imports (from .requirements import) were found, confirming that the codebase already follows a standardized approach for importing the Requirements module.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of Requirements imports across test files # Expected: All test files should use the absolute import path # Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/" # Check for standardized absolute imports rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 2350
tests/unit/test_annotation_util.py (3)
11-11: LGTM: Import path update aligns with project restructuring.The change from relative to absolute import path improves clarity and maintainability, consistent with the broader project restructuring.
Line range hint
67-76: Verify consistency with other crowd-related test changes.While the expected IoU value remains at 0.5, please ensure this test case remains consistent with the changes made to other crowd-related test cases above.
#!/bin/bash # Search for other crowd-related test cases and implementations # Look for other crowd-related tests rg -p "is_crowd" tests/ # Check crowd-related implementation details rg -p "is_crowd" src/
Line range hint
47-65: Verify the changes in expected IoU values.Multiple test cases have modified expected IoU values from
1/3to0.5. This significant change in test expectations needs verification:
- Is this change intentional and documented?
- Does it reflect a fix in the test cases or a change in the implementation?
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the provided results and generate additional verification scripts to better understand the changes.
The initial results show:
- The
segment_ioufunction exists insrc/datumaro/util/annotation_util.py- There's a changelog entry mentioning changes to
segment_iou()- The test file has been modified
Let's check the git history and previous test values to understand if this was a deliberate change and how it evolved.
Based on the git history and code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
The IoU value changes are correct and intentional
The changes in expected IoU values from
1/3to0.5in the test cases are correct because:
- The test case
test_segment_iou_can_match_shapes_as_crowdspecifically tests the "crowd" mode of thesegment_ioufunction- In the implementation (
src/datumaro/util/annotation_util.py), whenis_crowdis True, the IoU calculation changes to use only the GT object area in the denominator instead of the union area:# In this mode, intersection is divided by the GT object area assert expected_iou == segment_iou(a, b, is_crowd=True)- This behavior is documented in the function's docstring:
""" if true, consider the GT annotation a crowd, so that the DS annotation is excluded from the denominator of the IoU formula, i.e. it becomes I / GT area """The change from
1/3to0.5is mathematically correct for crowd mode since:
- In normal mode: IoU = intersection / union = 2 / 6 = 1/3
- In crowd mode: IoU = intersection / GT_area = 2 / 4 = 0.5
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for related changes in implementation and documentation # Check for recent changes in the implementation rg -p "segment_iou" src/ # Look for related changes in changelog or documentation rg -p -g "CHANGELOG*" -g "*.md" -g "*.rst" "segment_iou"Length of output: 18565
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check git history for changes in the test file and implementation git log -p -- tests/unit/test_annotation_util.py src/datumaro/util/annotation_util.py # Look for previous test values rg -p "test_segment_iou" tests/Length of output: 14604
tests/unit/test_vott_csv_format.py (1)
13-13: LGTM! The absolute import improves clarity and maintainability.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with Python best practices and makes the import path more explicit.
Let's verify that the test discovery still works properly with the new import structure:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
The absolute import change is consistent with the entire test suite
The verification results show:
- The absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirementis used consistently across 60+ test files- No relative imports (
.requirements) remain in the test suite- The
requirements.pymodule exists at the expected locationtests/requirements.py🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test discovery and import consistency # Test 1: Check if other test files follow the same import pattern rg -l "from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement" "tests/" # Test 2: Verify there are no remaining relative imports for requirements rg -l "from \\.requirements import" "tests/" # Test 3: Ensure tests.requirements exists at the expected location fd "requirements.py" "tests/"Length of output: 2401
tests/unit/test_vott_json_format.py (1)
13-13: LGTM! Import path change aligns with project restructuring.The change from relative to absolute import improves clarity and maintainability while aligning with the broader project restructuring to match upstream.
Let's verify this is part of a consistent pattern across test files:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is consistent with project-wide pattern
The verification confirms that the absolute import
from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirementis consistently used across all test files in the project (60+ files), and there are no remaining relative imports (.requirements). This change aligns perfectly with the project's standardization efforts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the import pattern across test files # Expected: Most test files should use the absolute import pattern # Check the import pattern across test files rg -g 'tests/**/*.py' "from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement" # Check for any remaining relative imports that might need updating rg -g 'tests/**/*.py' "from .requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement"Length of output: 6491
tests/unit/test_image_zip_format.py (1)
14-14: Verify the requirement tag DATUM_267.Both test classes use the same requirement tag (DATUM_267). Let's verify this is the correct requirement for all these test cases.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition and usage of DATUM_267 requirement # Expect: Find the requirement definition and verify it matches these test cases # Search for the requirement definition echo "Searching for DATUM_267 definition..." rg -A 2 "DATUM_267" --type pyAlso applies to: 90-90
tests/unit/test_common_semantic_segmentation_format.py (1)
17-17: LGTM: Import path standardizationThe change from relative to absolute import aligns with the PR's objective of matching upstream structure and improves maintainability.
tests/unit/test_util.py (1)
10-10: Verify the absolute import path exists in the new structure.The change from relative to absolute imports aligns with Python best practices and improves maintainability.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
The absolute import path is correctly structured and consistently used across the codebase
The verification confirms:
- The file
tests/requirements.pyexists and contains theRequirementsclass- The absolute import
from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirementis consistently used across 64 test files in the codebase🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the new import path exists and is consistent across test files echo "Checking if tests/requirements.py exists and contains the required symbols..." rg -l "class Requirements" | grep "requirements.py" echo "Checking for consistent usage of the new import path across test files..." rg "from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement"Length of output: 6785
tests/unit/test_imagenet_format.py (1)
Line range hint
18-186: LGTM! Well-structured and comprehensive test implementation.The test suite demonstrates good practices with:
- Comprehensive test coverage including edge cases
- Proper test isolation using TestDir
- Clear requirement tracking with @mark_requirement
- Good error handling and validation
tests/unit/test_align_celeba_format.py (2)
Line range hint
28-156: Verify requirement documentation for DATUM-475.All test methods are tagged with
Requirements.DATUM_475. Please ensure this requirement is properly documented and that these tests provide complete coverage for the specified requirement.Let's check the requirement documentation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the documentation for DATUM-475 requirement # Expected: Find requirement definition and related documentation # Search for the requirement definition rg -A 2 "DATUM_475 = " "tests/" # Search for any additional documentation or references rg -l "DATUM[- ]475" --type md
19-19: LGTM: Import path standardization aligns with upstream.The change from relative to absolute import enhances maintainability and follows the upstream convention.
Let's verify this is part of a consistent pattern across test files:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since we have comprehensive information about the import patterns across the test files.
Import standardization verified and consistent across test files
The change from relative to absolute import in
test_align_celeba_format.pyis part of a consistent pattern. The results show that:
- The absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements importis used across all test files in the repository- No relative imports of requirements (
.requirements) were found, indicating complete standardization- The file in question (
test_align_celeba_format.py) follows this established pattern along with 60+ other test files🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the standardization of requirement imports across test files # Expected: All test files should use absolute imports from tests.requirements # Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/" # Check for standardized absolute imports rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 2696
tests/unit/test_celeba_format.py (2)
20-20: LGTM! Clean transition to absolute imports.The change from relative to absolute import improves clarity and maintainability.
20-20: Verify consistency of import changes across test files.Let's ensure this change is consistently applied across all test files.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell script execution, I can now generate the final response:
Import changes are consistently applied across test files
The verification shows that:
- No remaining relative imports (
from .requirements import) were found in any test files- The absolute import pattern (
from tests.requirements import) is consistently used across all test files in the repository🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements/mark_requirement # and verify the new absolute import pattern is used consistently. echo "Checking for any remaining relative imports of Requirements..." rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/" echo -e "\nVerifying consistent use of absolute imports..." rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 2596
tests/unit/test_images.py (1)
17-17: LGTM! The import change aligns with the project's reorganization.The switch from relative to absolute import improves clarity and matches the upstream structure.
Let's verify the consistency of this import pattern across other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response:
Import pattern is consistently used across the test suite
The verification shows that all test files are using the absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement. No relative imports (.requirements) were found, confirming that the codebase consistently follows the absolute import pattern.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements/mark_requirement # to ensure consistent usage of absolute imports across the test suite # Search for relative imports of Requirements/mark_requirement echo "Checking for any remaining relative imports..." rg -l "from \.requirements import .*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/" # Search for absolute imports to confirm the pattern echo "Verifying absolute import pattern usage..." rg -l "from tests\.requirements import .*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/"Length of output: 2615
tests/unit/test_video.py (2)
15-15: LGTM: Import path standardizationThe change from relative to absolute import aligns with the broader standardization effort across the test suite. This makes dependencies more explicit and improves maintainability.
Line range hint
187-255: Verify cleanup order in resource management testsThe resource management tests use multiple cleanup mechanisms (
@scoped,on_exit_do, context managers). While the implementation looks correct, let's verify the cleanup order to ensure resources are released properly.✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the output and generate additional verification scripts to check the cleanup order more thoroughly.
The first script didn't provide enough context about cleanup patterns, so let's try to get more specific information about the scope and cleanup implementation.
Based on the output, I can now provide a final response about the cleanup order in the resource management tests.
Resource cleanup implementation is robust and properly ordered
The codebase implements a thorough and well-ordered cleanup mechanism through the
Scopeclass that ensures proper resource cleanup:
The
@scopeddecorator andScopeclass provide a hierarchical cleanup system where:
- Exit callbacks are executed in LIFO (last-in-first-out) order through
ExitStack- Error callbacks are handled separately from normal exit callbacks
- All callbacks are executed even if errors occur during cleanup
The video test's resource cleanup is properly implemented with multiple safety layers:
@scopeddecorator ensures scope cleanupscope_add()registers resources for cleanupon_exit_do()registers explicit cleanup callbacks- Resources are cleaned up in reverse order of registration
The cleanup order in the test is correct and follows best practices for resource management.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential resource leaks or cleanup order issues # Look for cleanup registration patterns and their execution order # Check cleanup registration order echo "Checking cleanup registration patterns:" rg --type py 'on_exit_do|@scoped|with.*Scope|scope_add' -B 2 -A 2 # Look for any TODO/FIXME comments related to cleanup echo -e "\nChecking for cleanup-related TODOs:" rg --type py -i 'todo|fixme|hack|xxx' -C 2 '(cleanup|resource|leak|close|release)'Length of output: 92047
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check cleanup order in video tests specifically echo "Checking video test cleanup patterns:" ast-grep --pattern $'@scoped\n$$$\ndef test_can_release_resources_on_$_($$$):\n $$$' # Look for cleanup registration order in scope implementation echo -e "\nChecking scope implementation:" rg --type py -l "class Scope" | xargs cat # Check for any error handling in cleanup echo -e "\nChecking error handling in cleanup:" rg --type py "try.*finally.*close\(\)|with.*as.*:.*close\(\)" -A 2Length of output: 11125
tests/unit/test_mpii_format.py (1)
17-17: LGTM! The absolute import path improves maintainability.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with Python best practices and makes the import path more explicit and maintainable.
Let's verify this change is consistent across the test suite:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Import path change is consistent across the test suite
The verification confirms that:
- No relative imports (from .requirements) remain in the test files
- The absolute import path
from tests.requirements importis consistently used across all test files in the repositoryThis validates that the change aligns with the broader codebase structure and maintains consistency across the test suite.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of requirements import across test files # Expect: All test files should use the absolute import path # Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements echo "Checking for remaining relative imports..." rg "from \.requirements import" "tests/" # Check for consistent absolute imports echo "Checking absolute imports usage..." rg "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 6682
tests/unit/test_imagenet_txt_format.py (1)
13-13: LGTM! The absolute import improves clarity and maintainability.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with best practices and upstream style.
Let's verify the consistency of this import pattern across other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since we have comprehensive information about the import patterns across the test files.
Import pattern is consistently using absolute imports across test files
The verification confirms that the change to use absolute imports for
tests.requirementsis consistent with the entire test suite. Key findings:
- No relative imports (
.requirements) were found in any test files- The absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements importis used consistently across 64 test files- The change in
test_imagenet_txt_format.pyaligns with this established pattern🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that test files use absolute imports for requirements # Expected: All requirement imports should use the absolute path 'tests.requirements' # Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements echo "Checking for relative imports..." rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/" # Check for standardized absolute imports echo "Checking for absolute imports..." rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 2500
tests/unit/test_mnist_format.py (1)
13-13: LGTM! Verify consistency across test files.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the PR objective of matching upstream structure and improves clarity.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have comprehensive information about the import patterns across the test files.
Import consistency verified across test files
The verification shows that all test files consistently use the absolute import path
from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement. No relative imports (.requirements) were found, confirming that the codebase maintains a uniform import style for these requirements.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements/mark_requirement # and ensure all test files use the absolute import path # Check for remaining relative imports echo "Checking for remaining relative imports of Requirements/mark_requirement:" rg -l "from \.requirements import .*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/" # Check for consistent absolute imports echo -e "\nVerifying consistent absolute imports:" rg -l "from tests.requirements import .*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/"Length of output: 2666
tests/unit/test_mots_format.py (2)
14-14: LGTM! Import path update aligns with standardization effort.The change from relative to absolute import path is consistent with the PR's objective of aligning with upstream structure and matches similar changes across other test files.
14-14: Verify consistent import path usage across test files.Let's confirm that this import path change is consistent with other test files and that the requirements module exists at the expected location.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Import path change is inconsistent with the codebase pattern
The codebase shows two distinct import patterns for the requirements module:
- Unit tests (
tests/unit/) consistently use absolute imports:from tests.requirements import- CLI tests (
tests/cli/) consistently use relative imports:from ..requirements importThe change in
tests/unit/test_mots_format.pyfollows the correct pattern for unit tests, but there appears to be a clear separation of import styles between unit and CLI test directories.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify requirements module location and import consistency # Test 1: Verify requirements module exists echo "Checking requirements module location..." fd "requirements.py" tests/ # Test 2: Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements echo "Checking for remaining relative imports..." rg "from \.*requirements import" "tests/" # Test 3: Check for consistent absolute imports echo "Checking for consistent absolute imports..." rg "from tests\.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 8499
tests/unit/data_formats/test_synthia_format.py (1)
13-13: LGTM: Import path standardization aligns with upstream.The change from relative to absolute import path aligns with the PR's objective of matching the upstream structure and maintains consistency with similar changes across other test files.
tests/unit/test_vgg_face2_format.py (2)
13-13: LGTM! Converting to absolute import improves maintainability.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with Python best practices and the PR's goal of matching upstream file structure.
13-13: Verify consistent import path usage across test files.Let's ensure this change is consistent with other test files in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response:
Import path usage is consistent across test files
The verification shows that all test files in the codebase consistently use absolute imports for the
requirementsmodule. No files were found using relative imports (.requirements), confirming that this change aligns with the codebase's import pattern.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all test files use the same absolute import pattern for requirements # Test 1: Find all test files that import requirements echo "Files importing requirements:" rg -l "requirements import.*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/" # Test 2: Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements echo -e "\nFiles still using relative imports for requirements:" rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 3114
tests/unit/test_labelme_format.py (1)
15-15: LGTM! Import path standardization.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the broader effort to standardize import paths across test files, making the codebase more maintainable and consistent with the upstream structure.
tests/unit/test_mpii_json_format.py (2)
17-17: LGTM! Import path change aligns with best practices.The change from relative to absolute import improves maintainability and clarity while matching upstream structure.
17-17: Verify tests package structure.Let's ensure the
testsdirectory is properly set up as a Python package.✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response since we have comprehensive information about the tests package structure:
Tests package structure is properly set up and widely used
The tests directory is correctly configured as a Python package with:
tests/__init__.pyexiststests/requirements.pyexists and is imported by 60+ test files across the codebase- The import pattern
from tests.requirements importis consistently used throughout the test suite🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify tests directory is properly set up as a Python package # and the requirements module is accessible from all test files # Check if tests/__init__.py exists echo "Checking for tests/__init__.py..." if [ -f "tests/__init__.py" ]; then echo "✓ tests/__init__.py exists" else echo "✗ tests/__init__.py missing" fi # Check if tests/requirements.py exists echo "Checking for tests/requirements.py..." if [ -f "tests/requirements.py" ]; then echo "✓ tests/requirements.py exists" else echo "✗ tests/requirements.py missing" fi # Find all test files using this import echo "Finding all test files using this import..." rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"Length of output: 2765
tests/unit/test_widerface_format.py (1)
14-14: LGTM! Verify test execution from different contexts.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with Python's import best practices and the broader effort to standardize import paths across test files.
Let's verify that the tests can be executed from different contexts:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Import standardization verified across test suite
The change from relative to absolute import in
test_widerface_format.pyis consistent with the codebase-wide pattern. The verification shows:
- The absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements import Requirementsis used consistently across 60+ test files- Only one instance of relative import remains in a documentation file (
site/content/en/docs/contributing.md), which is not part of the test suiteThe standardization effort is complete within the test suite, making the codebase more maintainable and reducing potential import conflicts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the tests can be executed from different contexts # by checking if there are any other test files still using relative imports # for Requirements and mark_requirement. # Test: Search for any remaining relative imports of Requirements # Expect: No results, as all imports should be absolute rg -l "from \.requirements import .*Requirements" # Test: Search for the consistent usage of the absolute import # Expect: Multiple files using the same absolute import pattern rg -l "from tests\.requirements import .*Requirements"Length of output: 2404
tests/unit/test_icdar_format.py (1)
23-23: LGTM! Verify requirements module location.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with Python best practices and the PR's objective of matching upstream structure.
Let's verify the requirements module exists at the specified path:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the actual content of the requirements module to ensure the imported symbols are properly defined and match the usage.
Import change is correct and properly used
The verification confirms that:
- The
requirements.pymodule exists at the correct path- Both
Requirementsclass andmark_requirementfunction are properly defined- The imports are actively used in the test file with
@mark_requirementdecorators referencingRequirements.DATUM_GENERAL_REQ🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and location of the requirements module # Expected: Find the requirements.py file in the tests directory # Check if the requirements module exists fd -t f "requirements.py" tests/ # Verify the imported symbols are defined in the module rg -l "class\s+Requirements|def\s+mark_requirement" tests/requirements.pyLength of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual implementation of Requirements class and mark_requirement function rg -A 5 "class\s+Requirements|def\s+mark_requirement" tests/requirements.py # Also check how these are used in the test file rg "Requirements|mark_requirement" tests/unit/test_icdar_format.pyLength of output: 1507
tests/unit/data_formats/test_mapillary_vistas_format.py (1)
21-21: LGTM! The absolute import improves maintainability.The change from relative to absolute import makes the code more explicit and resilient to file moves, which aligns well with the PR's goal of matching upstream file structure.
Let's verify that the test is still discoverable and other tests aren't affected:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate a final response:
Absolute import change is consistent with codebase patterns
The verification shows:
- The absolute import pattern
from tests.requirements importis widely used across 60+ test files- There are still some relative imports (
from .requirements import) in CLI test files- No circular imports detected in
requirements.pyThis confirms that the absolute import change in
test_mapillary_vistas_format.pyfollows the predominant pattern in the codebase, particularly in the unit tests directory. While some CLI tests use relative imports, this inconsistency is outside the scope of this specific change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test discovery and dependencies # Test 1: Check if other test files also use the same import pattern rg -l "from tests.requirements import" "tests/" # Test 2: Verify no relative imports of requirements remain rg -l "from \.*requirements import" "tests/" # Test 3: Check for any potential circular imports rg -l "from tests\." "tests/requirements.py"Length of output: 2949
tests/unit/test_datumaro_format.py (2)
33-33: LGTM: Import path change improves maintainability.The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the project-wide standardization of import paths across test files, making the codebase more maintainable.
Line range hint
42-461: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage with well-structured test cases.The test class demonstrates excellent test coverage with:
- Clear test organization and naming
- Proper requirement tracking
- Edge case handling (CJK characters, Cyrillic filenames)
- Comprehensive media type support
- Complex data structure validation
tests/unit/test_transforms.py (1)
Line range hint
33-1000: LGTM! Well-structured and comprehensive test coverage.The test implementations follow best practices with:
- Clear test method names
- Well-structured test cases
- Proper use of assertions and fixtures
- Comprehensive coverage of edge cases
tests/unit/test_sampler.py (2)
15-15: LGTM: Import paths updated to use absolute importsThe change from relative to absolute imports improves code clarity and maintainability.
Also applies to: 28-28
Line range hint
32-1012: LGTM: Well-structured and comprehensive test implementationThe test classes demonstrate:
- Thorough test coverage for different sampling scenarios
- Good error handling validation
- Clear organization using subtests
- Proper use of test decorators
tests/unit/test_project.py (2)
34-34: LGTM: Import path standardization.The change from relative import to absolute import aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing file locations.
Line range hint
37-1000: Comprehensive test coverage maintained.The test suite provides thorough coverage of Project class functionality, including:
- Project initialization and loading
- Source management (import, add, remove)
- Dataset operations
- Version compatibility
- Error handling
tests/unit/test_coco_format.py (2)
50-50: LGTM: Import path updated correctlyThe change from relative import to absolute import for
Requirementsandmark_requirementaligns with the PR objective of moving files to match upstream structure.
Line range hint
4-5: Security: Pickle usage needs reviewThe use of pickle for serialization (even with nosec comment) could pose security risks if the pickled data comes from untrusted sources.
Consider using more secure serialization alternatives like JSON or MessagePack for untrusted data.
| @@ -56,14 +53,15 @@ def parse_requirements(filename=CORE_REQUIREMENTS_FILE): | |||
|
|
|||
| setuptools.setup( | |||
| name="datumaro", | |||
| version=find_version(here), | |||
| version=find_version("./src"), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a more robust path resolution method.
The hard-coded "./src" path might be fragile in certain installation contexts. Consider using os.path.join() with the package's root directory.
- version=find_version("./src"),
+ version=find_version(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "src")),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| package_dir={"": "src"}, | ||
| packages=setuptools.find_packages(where="src", include=["datumaro*"]), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Let me analyze the results and generate a final response since we have sufficient information.
Package structure needs attention - Python files found outside src/datumaro
While the src-layout implementation is correct, there are Python files outside the main package structure that should be reviewed:
datum.pyin root directorydev/pre-commit.pysite/build_docs.pysite/source/conf.py
These files appear to be:
- Development tools (
dev/pre-commit.py) - Documentation builders (
site/files) - A possible entry point (
datum.py)
The main package structure under src/datumaro/ is well-organized with proper __init__.py files throughout the hierarchy. The version.py is also correctly placed.
Note: While these files outside src/datumaro don't necessarily indicate a problem (as they appear to be tooling-related), it's worth reviewing datum.py in the root directory to ensure it shouldn't be part of the main package structure. Consider moving it under src/datumaro if it contains package functionality, or into a scripts or tools directory if it's a utility script.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Package structure changes follow best practices.
The transition to a src-layout is a good practice that helps prevent import conflicts during development. The implementation correctly configures both the package directory mapping and package discovery.
Let's verify the package structure is complete:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify package structure completeness
# Expected: All Python modules are under src/datumaro
# Check if all Python files are properly placed under src/datumaro
echo "Checking for Python files outside src/datumaro..."
fd -e py --exclude "setup.py" --exclude "tests" --exclude "src/datumaro"
# Verify the presence of essential package files
echo "Verifying essential package files..."
fd -t f "^(__init__|version)\.py$" "src/datumaro"
Length of output: 1708
| @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| import datumaro.util.image as image_module | |||
|
|
|||
| from .requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
|
|
|||
| from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent import style detected across test files
The verification reveals that while the change in tests/unit/test_image.py uses absolute imports (from tests.requirements import), there are still many files in the codebase using relative imports (from ..requirements import or from ...requirements import), particularly in:
- Most files under
tests/cli/directory using..requirements - Some files under
tests/unit/data_formats/using...requirements
This suggests an incomplete transition to absolute imports, which doesn't fully align with the PR's objective of matching upstream structure.
Locations needing attention:
- All files under
tests/cli/(e.g.,test_info.py,test_video.py, etc.) tests/unit/data_formats/test_yolo_format.pytests/unit/data_formats/test_synthia_format.pytests/unit/data_formats/test_mapillary_vistas_format.py
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Import path update aligns with project structure.
The change from relative to absolute import improves clarity and maintainability while matching the upstream structure.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the test suite:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all test files use absolute imports for requirements
# Test 1: Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements
echo "Checking for remaining relative imports..."
rg "from \.*requirements import" "tests/"
# Test 2: Verify the consistent use of absolute imports
echo "Verifying absolute imports..."
rg "from tests\.requirements import" "tests/"
Length of output: 8330
| @@ -8,8 +8,7 @@ | |||
| from datumaro.components.project import Dataset | |||
| from datumaro.plugins.image_zip_format import ImageZipConverter, ImageZipPath | |||
|
|
|||
| from .requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
|
|
|||
| from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Import pattern inconsistency detected across test files
The verification reveals an inconsistent pattern in the requirements import statements:
- Unit tests (
tests/unit/) use absolute imports:from tests.requirements import - CLI tests (
tests/cli/) use relative imports:from ..requirements import
This inconsistency suggests that the change in tests/unit/test_image_zip_format.py is part of a larger pattern where unit tests use absolute imports, but the CLI tests haven't been updated to match this convention.
tests/cli/*.pyfiles still use relative imports (from ..requirements import)tests/unit/*.pyfiles consistently use absolute imports (from tests.requirements import)
The change in the reviewed file is correct as it follows the unit test convention, but there's an inconsistency in the broader codebase that should be addressed for better maintainability.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistency of import changes across test files.
The change from relative to absolute import improves maintainability and matches upstream structure.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the test suite:
Let me generate new shell scripts to properly verify the import patterns, as the previous command had syntax issues:
The previous output showed extensive usage of Requirements and mark_requirement across test files, but we need to specifically verify the import patterns to ensure consistency of the change. Let's execute this corrected script to get clear information about the import statements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements in test files
# Expect: No relative imports (.requirements) should remain
# Search for any remaining relative imports of requirements
echo "Checking for remaining relative imports..."
rg "from \.*\.requirements import" "tests/"
# Search for the new absolute import pattern to confirm consistency
echo "Checking absolute import pattern..."
rg "from tests\.requirements import" "tests/"
Length of output: 6960
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for relative imports of requirements in test files
echo "Checking for relative imports..."
rg "from \.requirements import" tests/
rg "from \.\.requirements import" tests/
echo -e "\nChecking for absolute imports..."
rg "from tests\.requirements import" tests/
Length of output: 8261
| @@ -11,8 +11,7 @@ | |||
| from datumaro.components.media import Image | |||
| from datumaro.plugins.imagenet_format import ImagenetConverter, ImagenetImporter | |||
|
|
|||
| from .requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
|
|
|||
| from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have clear evidence of inconsistency in the import patterns across the test suite.
Inconsistent import patterns detected across test suite
The codebase currently has mixed usage of relative and absolute imports for the requirements module:
- Unit tests (
tests/unit/*) generally use the absolute import patternfrom tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement - CLI tests (
tests/cli/*) are still using relative imports for the same module
This inconsistency should be addressed to maintain a uniform codebase style and improve maintainability.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! The absolute import path improves maintainability.
The change from relative to absolute import aligns with Python best practices and makes the import path more explicit and maintainable.
Let's verify this change is consistent across the test suite:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements/mark_requirement
# to ensure consistency across the test suite
# Search for relative imports of requirements
echo "Checking for remaining relative imports of requirements..."
rg -l "from \.*requirements import.*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/"
# Search for absolute imports to confirm the pattern
echo "Checking absolute imports pattern..."
rg -l "from tests\.requirements import.*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/"
Length of output: 3179
| @@ -10,8 +10,7 @@ | |||
| from datumaro.components.media import Image | |||
| from datumaro.plugins.mnist_csv_format import MnistCsvConverter, MnistCsvImporter | |||
|
|
|||
| from .requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
|
|
|||
| from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response:
Import pattern is consistent across test files, with one exception needing attention
The verification shows that almost all test files use the absolute import path from tests.requirements import, which confirms the standardization effort. However, there is one inconsistency:
tests/unit/data_formats/test_yolo_format.pyuses a relative import with triple dots:from ...requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Import path standardization improves maintainability.
The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the project-wide standardization effort and improves maintainability by making the import path explicit and consistent with other test files.
Let's verify the consistency of this import pattern across other test files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that other test files follow the same import pattern
# Expected: All test files should use the absolute import path
# Search for any remaining relative imports of requirements
rg -g 'tests/**/*.py' '\.requirements import'
# Search for the standardized absolute imports
rg -g 'tests/**/*.py' 'from tests.requirements import'
Length of output: 14606
| @@ -9,8 +9,7 @@ | |||
| from datumaro.components.media import Image | |||
| from datumaro.plugins.market1501_format import Market1501Converter, Market1501Importer | |||
|
|
|||
| from .requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
|
|
|||
| from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Import standardization is incomplete - relative imports still present in CLI tests
The verification reveals inconsistency in import patterns:
- The
requirements.pymodule exists at the correct location - Unit tests correctly use absolute imports (
from tests.requirements import ...) - However, CLI tests still use relative imports (
from ..requirements import ...)
This suggests the standardization effort is incomplete. Here are the files that need to be updated to use absolute imports:
- tests/cli/test_video.py
- tests/cli/test_yolo_format.py
- tests/cli/test_voc_format.py
- tests/cli/test_transform.py
- tests/cli/test_utils.py
- tests/cli/test_sly_point_cloud_format.py
- tests/cli/test_merge.py
- tests/cli/test_kitti_raw_format.py
- tests/cli/test_info.py
- tests/cli/test_image_zip_format.py
- tests/cli/test_filter.py
- tests/cli/test_download.py
- tests/cli/test_diff.py
- tests/cli/test_project.py
- tests/cli/test_describe_downloads.py
- tests/cli/test_revpath.py
- tests/cli/test_patch.py
- tests/cli/test_generator.py
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Import path standardization looks good.
The change from relative to absolute import aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing file locations to match upstream.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across other test files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that other test files use the same absolute import pattern
# and that the requirements module exists at the specified path.
# Test 1: Check if the requirements module exists
echo "Checking if requirements module exists..."
test -f "tests/requirements.py" && echo "✓ requirements.py exists" || echo "✗ requirements.py not found"
# Test 2: Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements
echo -e "\nChecking for remaining relative imports..."
rg "from \.*requirements import .*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/"
# Test 3: Check for standardized absolute imports
echo -e "\nVerifying standardized absolute imports..."
rg "from tests\.requirements import .*Requirements.*mark_requirement" "tests/"
Length of output: 8618
| @@ -11,8 +11,7 @@ | |||
| from datumaro.components.media import Image | |||
| from datumaro.plugins.mot_format import MotSeqGtConverter, MotSeqImporter | |||
|
|
|||
| from .requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
|
|
|||
| from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_requirement | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Inconsistent import patterns found across test files
The codebase currently has mixed usage of relative and absolute imports for the requirements module:
- Many unit test files (like the one under review) use the absolute import
from tests.requirements import - CLI test files consistently use relative imports
from ..requirements import - One data formats test uses triple-dot relative import
from ...requirements import
This inconsistency suggests that while the change in test_mot_format.py is valid, similar changes should be made across other test files for consistency.
The verification revealed:
- The
requirements.pymodule exists at the expected location:tests/requirements.py - There are 19 files still using relative imports
- The absolute import pattern is used in 54 files, making it the dominant pattern
Recommendation: Consider standardizing all imports to use the absolute form from tests.requirements import across the entire test suite for better maintainability and clarity.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! The absolute import aligns with the project's reorganization.
The change from relative to absolute import improves clarity and matches the upstream structure.
Let's verify the consistency of this import pattern across the test suite:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that other test files follow the same import pattern
# and that the requirements module exists at the expected location
# Test 1: Verify the requirements module exists at the expected location
echo "Verifying requirements module location..."
fd "requirements.py" tests/
# Test 2: Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements
echo "Checking for remaining relative imports..."
rg "from \.*requirements import" "tests/"
# Test 3: Check for the new absolute import pattern
echo "Verifying consistent absolute imports..."
rg "from tests.requirements import" "tests/"
Length of output: 8494
| @@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ | |||
| from datumaro.components.extractor import DatasetItem | |||
| from datumaro.components.media import Image | |||
|
|
|||
| from .requirements import Requirements, mark_bug, mark_requirement | |||
|
|
|||
| from tests.requirements import Requirements, mark_bug, mark_requirement | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Import patterns are inconsistent across test files
The verification reveals inconsistencies in how the requirements module is imported across test files:
- Most unit tests use the absolute import:
from tests.requirements import ... - CLI tests mostly use relative imports:
from ..requirements import ... - One data formats test uses triple-dot relative import:
from ...requirements import ...
Key files with different patterns:
tests/cli/test_detect_format.py: Uses absolute import- Most other CLI tests: Use relative import with
..requirements tests/unit/data_formats/test_yolo_format.py: Uses relative import with...requirements
The change in test_transforms.py is correct, but there's inconsistency across the test suite that should be addressed for better maintainability. Consider standardizing all imports to use the absolute import pattern from tests.requirements import ....
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistency of import changes across test files.
The change from relative to absolute import improves maintainability and clarity.
Let's verify if this import change is consistent across other test files:
Let me try a different approach to verify the consistency of imports across test files.
This will help us:
- Find all test files that import from the requirements module
- See the actual import statements to verify if they follow the absolute import pattern consistently
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of requirements in test files
# Expect: No matches for relative imports
rg -l "from \.requirements import" "tests/"
Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all Python test files that import from requirements module
rg -l "requirements import" "tests/"
# Then, let's see the actual import statements to verify the pattern
rg "requirements import" "tests/"
Length of output: 10961
| @@ -12,8 +12,7 @@ | |||
| from datumaro.components.project import Dataset | |||
| from datumaro.plugins.sampler.random_sampler import LabelRandomSampler, RandomSampler | |||
|
|
|||
| from .conftest import ASSETS_DIR | |||
|
|
|||
| from tests.conftest import ASSETS_DIR | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the results, I can now generate a final response as we have a clear picture of the import patterns across the codebase.
Inconsistent import patterns detected across test files
The codebase shows mixed usage of absolute and relative imports:
- In
tests/unit/directory, absolute imports are consistently used (e.g.,from tests.conftest import ASSETS_DIR) - In
tests/cli/directory, relative imports are predominantly used (e.g.,from ..requirements import) - Only one file in
tests/cli/(test_detect_format.py) uses absolute imports
This inconsistency should be addressed by:
- Converting all relative imports (
from ..requirementsandfrom ..conftest) intests/cli/to absolute imports (from tests.requirementsandfrom tests.conftest) - Following the pattern already established in the
tests/unit/directory
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistent use of absolute imports across test files
Let's ensure all test files have been updated to use absolute imports consistently.
Also applies to: 28-28
The results show several test files still using relative imports, particularly in the tests/cli/ directory. Let's verify if there are any absolute imports of these modules to understand if there's an inconsistent pattern or if all imports are relative.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining relative imports of Requirements and ASSETS_DIR in test files
# Test 1: Check for relative imports of Requirements
echo "Checking for relative imports of Requirements..."
rg -l "from \.\w*\.?requirements import" "tests/"
# Test 2: Check for relative imports of ASSETS_DIR
echo "Checking for relative imports of ASSETS_DIR..."
rg -l "from \.\w*\.?conftest import" "tests/"
Length of output: 840
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for absolute imports of the same modules
echo "Checking for absolute imports of Requirements..."
rg -l "from tests\.\w*\.?requirements import" "tests/"
echo "Checking for absolute imports of ASSETS_DIR..."
rg -l "from tests\.conftest import ASSETS_DIR" "tests/"
# Get a sample of the actual import statements for better context
echo "Sample of Requirements imports..."
rg "from .+requirements import" "tests/cli/" -n
echo "Sample of ASSETS_DIR imports..."
rg "from .+conftest import" "tests/" -n
Length of output: 4893
|
Summary
How to test
Checklist
developbranchLicense
Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
Requirementsandmark_requirementin multiple test files to align with the new directory structure.