Adding warning clause for better understanding #4619
Conversation
added a warning clause to use of i2c audio in esp32
Update i2s_audio.rst
WalkthroughThe documentation for the I²S Audio Component has been updated to include a more prominent warning about its compatibility. The change emphasizes that the component is exclusively functional on ESP32-based chips, using a warning block format to improve visibility of this critical limitation for users. Changes
Suggested Reviewers
Note: No sequence diagram is generated for this documentation update, as it involves a simple documentation change without modifying any functional code or control flow. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/i2s_audio.rst(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
components/i2s_audio.rst (1)
Pattern **: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
🪛 GitHub Check: build
components/i2s_audio.rst
[failure] 12-12:
Directive 'warning' is not followed by an empty line. Please insert an empty line after components/i2s_audio.rst:12
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint
components/i2s_audio.rst
[error] 12-12: Directive 'warning' is not followed by an empty line. Please insert an empty line after the directive.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/i2s_audio.rst (1)
12-13: Great improvement to the compatibility warning!The warning block format makes the ESP32 compatibility requirement more prominent and easier to notice compared to the previous inline text. This enhancement will help users quickly understand the hardware requirements.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build
[failure] 12-12:
Directive 'warning' is not followed by an empty line. Please insert an empty line after components/i2s_audio.rst:12🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint
[error] 12-12: Directive 'warning' is not followed by an empty line. Please insert an empty line after the directive.
| .. warning:: | ||
| This component **only** works on ESP32 based chips. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix formatting: Add empty line after warning directive.
The warning directive must be followed by an empty line to comply with RST formatting rules.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
.. warning::
+
This component **only** works on ESP32 based chips.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .. warning:: | |
| This component **only** works on ESP32 based chips. | |
| .. warning:: | |
| This component **only** works on ESP32 based chips. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build
[failure] 12-12:
Directive 'warning' is not followed by an empty line. Please insert an empty line after components/i2s_audio.rst:12
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint
[error] 12-12: Directive 'warning' is not followed by an empty line. Please insert an empty line after the directive.
✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Description:
Related issue (if applicable): fixes
Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#
Checklist:
I am merging into
nextbecause this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.or
I am merging into
currentbecause this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.Link added in
/index.rstwhen creating new documents for new components or cookbook.