Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add: SIG-Scheduling annual report #8288

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sanposhiho
Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho commented Jan 18, 2025

/cc @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-misc @macsko @dom4ha @AxeZhan

Added the 2024 annual report for SIG-Scheduling.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #8271

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from AxeZhan January 18, 2025 04:39
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. label Jan 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from macsko and dom4ha January 18, 2025 04:39
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sanposhiho: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: kubernetes/sig-scheduling-misc.

Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

/cc @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-misc @macsko @dom4ha @AxeZhan

Added the 2024 annual report for SIG-Scheduling.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/annual-reports Issues or PRs related to the annual reports cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 18, 2025
- Alpha
- [4816 - DRA Prioritized List](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-scheduling/4816-dra-prioritized-list) - v1.32
- [4832 - Asynchronous Preemption](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-scheduling/4832-async-preemption) - v1.32

- Beta
- [3633 - Introduce MatchLabelKeys and MismatchLabelKeys to PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-scheduling/3633-matchlabelkeys-to-podaffinity) - v1.31
- [4247 - Per-plugin callback functions for efficient requeueing in the scheduling queue](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/4247-queueinghint/README.md) - v1.32
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was lacking. The metadata is fixed at kubernetes/enhancements#5050.

- [ ] [README.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
- [ ] [CONTRIBUTING.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
- [x] [README.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
- [x] [CONTRIBUTING.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
- [ ] Other contributing docs (e.g. in devel dir or contributor guide) reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, actually I don't think we have paid attention enough to these docs. We should review and update some docs (e.g., need to mention QHint at the queue doc etc)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Opened #8289 to track this problem

sig-scheduling/annual-report-2024.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sanposhiho
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @alculquicondor @Huang-Wei @ahg-g

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sanposhiho
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from ahg-g. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 19, 2025
@kerthcet
Copy link
Member

Thanks @sanposhiho LGTM

@macsko
Copy link
Member

macsko commented Jan 20, 2025

lgtm

Copy link
Member

@alculquicondor alculquicondor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot @sanposhiho!

sig-scheduling/annual-report-2024.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-scheduling/annual-report-2024.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-scheduling/annual-report-2024.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-scheduling/annual-report-2024.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-scheduling/annual-report-2024.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dom4ha
Copy link
Member

dom4ha commented Jan 20, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 21, 2025
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

/assign @BenTheElder
as our Liaison

@dom4ha
Copy link
Member

dom4ha commented Jan 22, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/annual-reports Issues or PRs related to the annual reports cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Needs Triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2024 Annual Report: SIG Scheduling