Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PEP 748: Fix ordered list numbering #4235

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

PEP 748: Fix ordered list numbering #4235

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ejm
Copy link

@ejm ejm commented Jan 27, 2025 •
edited by github-actions bot
Loading

  • Change is either:
    • To a Draft PEP
    • To an Accepted or Final PEP, with Steering Council approval
    • To fix an editorial issue (markup, typo, link, header, etc)
  • PR title prefixed with PEP number (e.g. PEP 123: Summary of changes)

Small fix for ordered list numbering. Thanks!

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4235.org.readthedocs.build/

@ejm ejm requested a review from ncoghlan as a code owner January 27, 2025 20:05
@cpython-cla-bot CPython CLA Bot
Copy link

cpython-cla-bot bot commented Jan 27, 2025 •
edited
Loading

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.
CLA signed

AA-Turner
AA-Turner reviewed Jan 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@AA-Turner AA-Turner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can also use auto-numbered lists using #., which is probably what was intended by repeated use of 1..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@AA-Turner AA-Turner AA-Turner left review comments

@ncoghlan ncoghlan Awaiting requested review from ncoghlan ncoghlan is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ejm @AA-Turner