-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PEP 774: Add Discussions-To link and minor revisions #4236
PEP 774: Add Discussions-To link and minor revisions #4236
Conversation
peps/pep-0774.rst
Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ | |||
PEP: 774 | |||
Title: Removing the LLVM requirement for JIT builds | |||
Author: Savannah Ostrowski <[email protected]> | |||
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-774-removing-the-llvm-requirement-for-jit-builds/78548 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could use the slightly shorter link here, and add a trailing comma to reduce the diff for any future threads (the trailing comma is removed on render)
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-774-removing-the-llvm-requirement-for-jit-builds/78548 | |
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/78548/, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@savannahostrowski Oops, sorry! I got mixed up with Post-History, which does accept trailing commas -- unlike Discussions-To.
To that point, if you make any further PRs updating the PEP, please could you add Post-History? It's probably not worth a standalone PR though.
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <[email protected]>
Wrong PEP number. :) |
...and here I thought it was neat that we had 744 and 774 😵💫 |
PEP 123: Summary of changes
)📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4236.org.readthedocs.build/