Add Broken Link Checker #7022
Closed
Add Broken Link Checker #7022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
commit 4627efc Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Sun Jul 14 11:52:56 2024 -0400 ready commit a1cfeb4 Author: Juan Diaz <[email protected]> Date: Sat Jul 6 12:21:02 2024 -0400 Delete jsoncheck.yml commit 75c5611 Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Fri Jul 5 13:37:24 2024 -0400 json commit c06b1a8 Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 21:11:04 2024 -0400 url test #4 commit 62a9f30 Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 20:58:13 2024 -0400 testing PR commit dc7c853 Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 20:46:02 2024 -0400 chore: Update branch name from test to main commit 3c43860 Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 20:38:54 2024 -0400 Check links from PRs commit a984731 Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 17:11:30 2024 -0400 false positives commit f6962bf Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 17:03:34 2024 -0400 Excluded urls commit be80ddf Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 16:40:37 2024 -0400 disable commit 872d94c Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 16:40:08 2024 -0400 conferences commit 6e2b197 Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 16:35:28 2024 -0400 24, 25, 26 commit 1975aeb Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 16:27:44 2024 -0400 json commit 4411458 Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 16:26:05 2024 -0400 json commit d7021ad Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 16:22:13 2024 -0400 check links commit 4984c76 Author: JuanPabloDiaz <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jul 4 16:02:22 2024 -0400 Broken Link Checker
|
I wonder if we could pass something like that as the input: 18162d9 But it's a bit unclear to me given their documentation. And testing GitHub actions is always a pain 😭 |
|
I found a simpler workflow that we could use instead (it is clean and easy to understand). I test it in one of my projects and it does the job. I am not sure how to pass that as input. |
|
Replaced by: #7132 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I am currently encountering an issue where the workflow is not automatically creating issues after running the script.
Upon reviewing the flagged broken links, it appears that many of them are related to cocUrl and cfpUrl. I believe it would be more effective to focus the checks exclusively on the url field. However, I am unsure how to implement this change.
Could someone please assist me with adjusting the script to only check the url field? Thank you!