Identical member names - PDS enhancement

[pujal0909]

What It Does

When copying PDSs, if the source and target have identical member names, the default behavior now is to prompt the user to confirm before overwriting the members contents (when the safe-replace option is not set to true). If the user uses the replace flag, it bypasses the prompt.

How to Test

1. Copy a source PDS into a target PDS, with both having members with the same names.
2. Notice that a prompt appears where you can select 'y/N'
3. Now copy the same source PDS into the same target PDS with the replace option.
4. Notice that the prompt is skipped

Review Checklist
I certify that I have:

• tested my changes
• added/updated automated tests
• updated the changelog
• followed the contribution guidelines

Additional Comments

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.38%. Comparing base (59b1fc5) to head (476f2a1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2427   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.37%   91.38%           
=======================================
  Files         639      639           
  Lines       18280    18298   +18     
  Branches     3847     3850    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        16703    16721   +18     
  Misses       1575     1575           
  Partials        2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

📅 Suggested merge-by date: 2/18/2025

[anaxceron]

Left some comments, please review.

[zFernand0]

LGTM! 😋

I did leave some comments for possible improvements, but I do like the code as-is and works as expected 🙏

[zFernand0]

I do like how clean this implementation looks! 🙏
And I know this might be a bit picky, but in order to minimize the number of calls to the mainframe, could we cache this call?
await List.allMembers(session, fromPds);

or perhaps return it as part of the function too? 😅

That way, the copyPDS doesn't have to make the same call to get the list of members from the fromPds` 😋

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[traeok]

Changes LGTM, thanks @pujal0909 for enhancing the copy PDS command!